Sex-biased and parental allele-specific gene regulation by KDM6A

Background KDM6A is a demethylase encoded by a gene with female-biased expression due to escape from X inactivation. Its main role is to facilitate gene expression through removal of the repressive H3K27me3 mark, with evidence of some additional histone demethylase-independent functions. KDM6A mutations have been implicated in congenital disorders such as Kabuki Syndrome, as well as in sex differences in cancer. Methods Kdm6a was knocked out using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in F1 male and female mouse embryonic stem cells (ES) derived from reciprocal crosses between C57BL6 x Mus castaneus. Diploid and allelic RNA-seq analyses were done to compare gene expression between wild-type and Kdm6a knockout (KO) clones. The effects of Kdm6a KO on sex-biased gene expression were investigated by comparing gene expression between male and female ES cells. Changes in H3K27me3 enrichment and chromatin accessibility at promoter regions of genes with expression changes were characterized by ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq followed by diploid and allelic analyses. Results We report that Kdm6a KO in male and female embryonic stem (ES) cells derived from F1 hybrid mice cause extensive gene dysregulation, disruption of sex biases, and specific parental allele effects. Among the dysregulated genes are candidate genes that may explain abnormal developmental features of Kabuki syndrome caused by KDM6A mutations in human. Strikingly, Kdm6a knockouts result in a decrease in sex-biased expression and in preferential downregulation of the maternal alleles of a number of genes. Most promoters of dysregulated genes show concordant epigenetic changes including gain of H3K27me3 and loss of chromatin accessibility, but there was less concordance when considering allelic changes. Conclusions Our study reveals new sex-related roles of KDM6A in the regulation of developmental genes, the maintenance of sex-biased gene expression, and the differential expression of parental alleles. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-022-00452-0.


Introduction
Embryonic development is governed by specific patterns of epigenetic modifications to control gene expression. For example, timely activation of Hox gene expression via resolution of bivalency in early development is facilitated by the histone demethylase KDM6A that removes methylation at lysine 27 of histone H3 [1][2][3][4]. Activation of gene expression by KDM6A is implicated in many developmental pathways such as myogenesis, cardiac development, neural stem cell differentiation, and immune cell functions [5][6][7][8][9]. KDM6A can also enhance gene expression independent of its demethylase activity by association to chromatin remodeling complexes that acetylates H3K27 at active enhancers through recruitment of p300 to the MLL complex [10][11][12]. In addition to its major role in gene activation, evidence suggests that KDM6A can also act as a repressor of gene expression, highlighting the complexity of this protein [12,13].
The higher level of KDM6A in female versus male mammals due to escape from X inactivation suggests a role in sex-specific gene regulation and in sex differences in health and disease [14][15][16]. Kdm6a modulates sex differences in autoimmunity and cancer, and more recently, it has been implicated in sex differences in Alzheimer's disease [8,17,18]. KDM6A is encoded by a dosage-sensitive X-linked gene and has a Y-encoded homolog (UTY) that has little or no demethylase activity [19][20][21]. Knockout of Kdm6a is homozygous lethal in female mice, while a small number of runt males survive, suggesting that UTY partially compensates for loss of KDM6A possibly via demethylation-independent mechanisms [22].
We hypothesized that increased dosage of Kdm6a in females may lead to gene regulation of sex-biased genes and that differential expression of Kdm6a in male and female germline could potentially lead to parent-oforigin biased gene expression in the next generation. To address these possibilities, we investigated the role of KDM6A in sex-biased autosomal gene regulation as well as expression and epigenetic regulation of maternal and paternal alleles in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Kdm6a knockouts (KO) were obtained by CRISPR/Cas9 approaches in ES cells derived from F1 hybrid mice from reciprocal crosses between C57BL/6 J (BL6) and Mus castaneus (cast) in which alleles can be distinguished based on SNPs. As measured by RNA-seq, sex-biased gene expression was markedly reduced following KO, with a preferential loss of female-biased expression. RNA-seq followed by allele-specific analyses revealed a subset of genes with parental allele-specific expression changes following Kdm6a KO, with more genes downregulated on maternal than paternal alleles.

Cell lines
BC male (E14) hybrid ES cells as well as CB male hybrid ES cells derived from reciprocal crosses between C57BL/6 J and Mus castaneus were provided by J. Gribnau (Erasmus MC Rotterdam, NL). All ES cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37ºC and 5% CO 2 in the presence of 1000 U/ml leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) (Millipore) on a monolayer of inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in ES media containing high glucose DMEM media supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% non-essential amino acids, 10 mg/ml APS, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 25 mM L-glutamine. Medium with serum and LIF was preferred to medium containing MEK1/2 and GSK3β inhibitors (2i), which can lead to DNA methylation changes [23,24]. Just prior to use, plates were enriched for ES cells by incubation on 0.1% gelatin coated dishes for 1 h to allow MEFs to attach, followed by transfer to fresh gelatin-coated plates for overnight culture. Following expansion, ES cells were split once (1:10) to further reduce potential MEF contamination.

ES cell differentiation
For embryoid body (EB) formation, 2 × 10 6 wt control and Kdm6a ΔE1 (see Fig. 1A and Additional file 1: Fig. S1 for definition of KO clones) cells were cultured on nonadherent bacterial culture dishes without LIF for 6 days, with media changed every two days. For retinoic acid induced neuronal differentiation, 1.2 × 10 6 wt control and Kdm6a ΔE1 cells were grown on gelatin-coated tissue culture plates without LIF and in the presence of 1 μM alltrans retinoic acid for 8 days, with media changed every two days. Pictures were taken at the indicated time points using a Motic AE2000 camera.

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
We chose a dual sgRNA approach because of the capacity to create large deletions ( Fig. 1A and Additional file 1: Fig. S1) [25]. In addition, two independent sets of sgR-NAs were used to account for off target effects. First, plasmids containing sgRNAs located in exons 2 and 4 were used to delete ~ 45 kb, resulting in multiple stop codons in five of the six possible translation frames.
Keywords: Sex biases, Parent-of-origin, Allele-specific, Imprinting, Gene regulation, Development, Epigenetics, Histone methylation, Chromatin Six-Frame translation analysis was used for in silico verification of newly acquired translation stop codons following Kdm6a targeting. For a second editing approach, we targeted the Kdm6a promoter region including exons 1 and 2. sgRNAs designed using the CHOPCHOP online tool were cloned into the CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid pX330 as described [26][27][28]. Exonic (E) deletion results in the loss of about 45 kb in length while the promoter (P) deletion results in a loss of about 4 kb in length. B, C Scatter plots of differential gene expression in three BC male Kdm6a Δ/Y clones (Kdm6a ΔE1 , Kdm6a ΔE3 , and Kdm6a ΔP4 ) versus two male BC wt clones (B), and three CB male Kdm6a Δ/Y clones (Kdm6a ΔE2.5 , Kdm6a ΔE2.7 , and Kdm6a ΔP2.1 ) versus two CB male wt clones (C). Log 2 values of genes with > 1TPM in at least one replicate are shown. Downregulated DEGs are labeled in red, upregulated DEGs in green, and genes lacking differential expression in grey. DESeq2 was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each cross using an FDR cutoff of < 0.05 and a ≥ 1.5 fold-change. D Venn diagrams of downregulated and upregulated genes as measured by a ≥ 1.25 fold change in log 2 TPM in male BC and CB Kdm6a Δ/Y clones versus wt. E GO analysis of dysregulated genes with a ≥ 1.25 fold change in log 2 TPM found in common between the BC and CB crosses. Numbers in parentheses represent the fold enrichment over expected number of genes within a given biological process, while those not in parentheses represent the number of genes in each category. F Log 2 expression fold changes for genes dysregulated in male Kdm6a Δ/Y clones derived from BC and CB crosses. The genes shown are associated with processes implicated in phenotypes seen in Kabuki syndrome (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; Has2 p = .05). See also Additional file 9 ES cells were transfected with sgRNAs containing CRISPR/Cas9 constructs and a plasmid carrying puromycin resistance (pPGKpuro) using UltraCruz ® transfection reagent at a 3:1 CRISPR to pPGKpuro ratio in media with no antibiotics. Two days later, cells were selected for 48-72 h with 1 μg/ml puromycin in complete ES media. Cells were allowed to recover in media with antibiotics. Following recovery, cells were cloned into 96 well plates using serial dilutions. Clones were expanded and screened for deletions using PCR and Sanger sequencing. PCR analysis confirmed correct gene editing of exons 2-4 in BC male ES cell clones Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 and CB male ES cell clones Kdm6a ΔE2. 5 and Kdm6a ΔE2.7 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Note that BC clones Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 were derived from a single CRISPR editing event. Indeed, Sanger sequencing showed that the deletion breakpoints in Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 were identical, suggesting that the clones were derived from a single targeting event. PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing confirmed the predicted ~ 4 kb deletion of the promoter region in BC male ES cell clones Kdm6a ΔP4 and CB ES clone Kdm6a ΔP2.1 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).
Kdm6a expression in Kdm6a ΔE clones was assayed by RT-PCR using primers specific for regions inside the deletion (spanning exons 3-6) and regions downstream of the deletion (spanning exons [23][24][25][26]. RT-PCR and RNA-seq analyses showed low-level expression of exons downstream of the deletion, but Western blot analysis showed complete ablation of the KDM6A protein, consistent with premature stop codons and published Kdm6a exon KO models (Additional file 1: Fig. S1) [21,28]. RNA-seq and RT-PCR expression analyses verified the lack of Kdm6a expression in clones with a promoter deletion. Note that the small alternative transcript annotated in UCSC (http:// genome. ucsc. edu/) was absent in Kdm6a ΔP clones as shown by the lack of reads in this region.

Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted from cells using Qiagen RNeasy mini kit followed by cDNA synthesis with the Promega GoScript reverse transcription kit. Relative transcript levels were determined using SYBR Green PCR master mix on the ABI 7900HT machine. All qRT-PCR assays were conducted in triplicates and normalized to Actb; the comparative CT method was used to analyze the data.

Western blotting
Nuclear protein lysates were prepared using the NE-PER protein extraction kit according to manufacturer's instructions. Protein immunoblots were done to confirm protein ablation in clones Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 . Concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay kit. Equal concentrations of protein lysates were loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels, Tris-glycine 8%. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes in Trisglycine plus methanol buffer overnight at 4 °C. After blocking with Tris-buffered saline (TBS), 0.1% Tween-20, 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature, membranes were incubated at 4 °C overnight with the primary antibody: rabbit polyclonal antibody against KDM6A (1:3000) (Bethyl Laboratories). After primary antibody incubation, immunoblots were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10,000) and visualized by chemiluminescence. Ponceau S staining of total protein served as a loading control.

Sanger sequencing
All plasmid, gDNA and cDNA lysates used for Sanger sequencing were made using Qiagen PCR purification columns. All reactions were prepared and submitted according to the protocols provided by Eurofin Genomics (www. operon. com).

RNA-seq with diploid analysis
Bulk RNA-seq indexed libraries were prepared using Illumina TruSeq RNA sample preparation kit V2. All libraries were generated from 1 µg of total RNA starting material prior to mRNA isolation. For BC derived ES cells libraries were prepared from two biological replicates from wt male controls and three Kdm6a Δ/Y male clones. For CB derived ES cells libraries were prepared from two biological replicates from wt controls and three Kdm6a Δ/Y clones. cDNA libraries were constructed for analysis on a NextSeq sequencer and 75 bp single-end reads were generated. Diploid gene expression was estimated using Tophat/v2.0.14 [29] with default parameters and gene-level expression was normalized using TPM (transcripts per kilobase of exon length per million mapped reads). Differentially expressed genes were determined using DESeq2 analysis [30] with a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 0.05 and a fold-change cutoff of 1.5. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was done using Panther Gene Ontology or DAVID GO [31][32][33]. Sex-biased gene expression in BC cells was determined by comparing female and male wt cells. Genes with ≥ twofold TPM expression differences (p ≤ 0.05; student's t-test) were considered sex-biased. A gain of sex-biased expression was defined as a ≥ twofold TPM expression differences and a p ≤ 0.05 (student's t-test) following KO. A summary of RNA-seq mapping metrics is shown in Additional file 14: Table S14. For analysis of sex-biased expression in CB cells, data from GSE90516 was re-analyzed to determine sex-biased genes in CB wt female and male cells [34]. Comparisons to CB Kdm6a KO cells were made following a quantile normalization.

RNA-seq with allele-specific analysis
To estimate allele-specific gene expression in hybrid cells, a "pseudo-castaneus" genome was first assembled by substituting known heterozygous SNPs of cast (obtained from Sanger Institute 2015/May, version 5 [35]) into the BL6 mm10 reference genome. RNA-seq reads were mapped using bowtie/v2.2.5 [36] to the genome and transcriptome of both the BL6 and the pseudo-cast genomes. Only those reads that mapped uniquely and with a highquality mapping score (MAPQ ≥ 30) to either the BL6 or pseudo-cast genomes were kept for further analyses. As previously described, all uniquely mapped and high-quality (MAPQ ≥ 30) reads were segregated into three categories: (1) BL6-SNP reads containing only BL6-specific SNP(s); (2) cast-SNP reads containing only cast-specific SNP(s); (3) allele-uncertain reads, that is, reads that do not contain valid SNPs (Additional file 14: Table S14) [37]. This resulted in ~ 11% and ~ 9% of reads mapped uniquely to the BL6 allele and the cast allele, respectively (Additional file 14: Table S14). For each gene i , denote the number of exonic BL6-SNP reads and cast-SNP reads be n i0 and n i1 , respectively. The BL6-allele expression proportion for gene i was then calculated as p i0 = n i0 /(n i0 + n i1 ) . To account for the mapping biases between the BL6 and the cast alleles, the BL6-allele expression proportion was further adjusted using the average BL6-allele mapping ratio of all autosomal genes r m = N A0 /N A1 , where N A0 and N A1 are the number of allele-specific autosomal reads in the BL6 genome and the cast genome, respectively. Specifically, the adjusted BL6allele expression proportion is p i0 = n i0 /(n i0 + r m n i1 ) . We assume that the diploid TPM value of gene i is the sum of haploid TPM values from the BL6-allele and the cast-allele. Thus, the BL6-allele TPM is estimated as TPM i0 = p i0 TPM i , while the cast-allele TPM is estimated as TPM i1 = 1 − p i0 TPM i . Samples derived from the CB cross were analyzed in a similar manner with the BL6-and pseudo-cast reference genomes switched between the maternal and paternal alleles.
Allele-specific differential gene expression was detected using DESeq2 with similar parameters as described in the above diploid DESeq2 analysis [30]. Post filtering of allele-specific expression levels was done to remove genes with estimated allelic expression < 1TPM. Allele-specific DEGs were first identified on the maternal and paternal alleles separately, using the corresponding allelic RNAseq read counts. Next, allelic downregulated DEGs were categorized into three groups: genes downregulated specifically on the maternal allele (Group A), genes downregulated specifically on the paternal allele (group B), and genes downregulated from both alleles (Group C). Allelic upregulated DEGs were similarly categorized into Groups D, E, and F as described in the main text. Note that our allele-specific RNA-seq analyses were performed independently from the diploid RNA-seq analyses, therefore the resulting allelic DEG list does not completely overlap with the diploid DEG list. For example, one gene could be upregulated from the maternal allele and downregulated from the paternal allele and therefore not identified as a diploid DEG.

ATAC-seq with allele-specific analysis
ATAC-seq was done on wt male ES cells from reciprocal crosses and on clones Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE2.5 as previously described [38]. Data were generated from libraries using a NextSeq sequencer to obtain 75 bp paired-end reads. ATAC-seq reads were mapped to the BL6 genome and the pseudo-cast genome, separately, using bwa/ 0.7.12 [39]. Uniquely mapped reads with a high-quality mapping score (MAPQ ≥ 30) to either the BL6 or the pseudo-cast genome were kept for the following analyses. To assist the allele-specific analysis, ATAC-seq reads were first classified as BL6-SNP reads, cast-SNP reads, or allele-uncertain reads, as described in the RNA-seq analysis. As long as one-end of the pairedend read was allele-certain, then the pair was assigned to the same allele. Read pairs with two ends assigned to different alleles were discarded from further analysis. In the following text, we refer to paired-end reads simply as "reads". Duplicate reads were removed using the Mark-Duplicates function in Picard/v2.14.1. To evaluate DNA accessibility of genes transcribed on the maternal-and paternal-alleles, allelic ATAC-seq read coverage were calculated at promoter regions (2 kb upstream and downstream of TSSs). Quantile normalization was used to minimize allele biases and batch differences between cell lines derived from reciprocal crosses by assuming that the promoter read coverage has a similar distribution between alleles and cell lines.

ChIP-seq with allelic-specific analyses
H3K27me ChIP-seq was performed on wt male ES cells from reciprocal crosses and on clones Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE2.5 as previously described [40]. ChIP libraries were prepared using the TruSeq V2 DNA preparation kit and matching input controls were sequenced by a NextSeq sequencer to produce 75 bp paired-end reads. Similar to ATAC-seq analysis (see above), ChIP-seq reads were mapped to the BL6 genome and the pseudo-cast genome separately, then uniquely mapped reads with high-quality mapping scores were assigned to the correct allele. Allelic promoter (± 2 kb of the TSS) coverage was scaled according to the sequencing depth and then normalized by the input control. To account for potential sequencing depth biases and allele differences, a quantile normalization method was applied (see above).

Kdm6a KO in mouse ES cells results in expression changes in developmentally important genes
Kdm6a was edited using CRISPR/Cas9 in F1 male ES cells derived either from a cross between BL6 x cast (BC) or from the reciprocal cross cast x B6 (CB), in which alleles can be distinguished using SNPs ( Fig. 1A and Additional file 1: Fig. S1) [41]. We derived stable Kdm6atargeted ES cell clones from both BC and CB crosses by inducing either a deletion between exons 2 and 4 (ΔE) or a deletion of exons 1 and 2 in the promoter region (ΔP) (   Table S8A). An off-target 314 kb deletion of three adjacent genes (Sh3kbp1, Map3k15, Pdha1) was identified in clones Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 , consistent with a common origin of these lines (Additional file 1: Fig. S1F). These genes were excluded in DEG analysis when considering expression changes between BC wt clones and BC Kdm6a Δ/Y clones. We also isolated control male ES cell clones (hereafter called CRISPRcontrols) derived from the BC cross, which were subject to the CRISPR/Cas9 treatment but did not exhibit a deletion of Kdm6a (Additional file 8: Table S8A).
RNA-seq analysis was done to compare gene expression between wild-type (wt) and Kdm6a KO clones derived from the BC and CB crosses. Using principal component analysis and hierarchal clustering based on expression values for all transcribed genes, wt clones segregated from KO clones (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A, B). The CB lines clustered away from the BC lines, likely due to parental strain-specific differences including the presence of an actin-GFP transgene in the wt CB line available to us. DESeq2 was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each cross using an FDR cutoff of < 0.05 and a ≥ 1.5 fold-change [30]. Kdm6a KO did not lead to reduced expression of pluripotency and self-renewal genes, confirming that KDM6A is not necessary to maintain pluripotency, nor did the editing process induce ES cell differentiation (Additional file 2: Fig.  S2C) [42]. Consistent with previous reports, differentiation kinetics for clone Kdm6a ΔE1 compared to wt showed slower formation of embryoid bodies and delayed appearance of neuronal cells after retinoic acid treatment (Additional file 2: Fig. S2D) [43,44].
In the BC cross, 195 downregulated and 334 upregulated DEGs were identified in the three male KO clones (Kdm6a Δ/Y ) compared to the two male wt clones ( Fig. 1B; Additional file 9: Table S9A). As expected, downregulated DEGs included known KDM6A targets, which were confirmed by qPCR and RT-PCR (Additional file 2: Fig. S2E, F). There did not appear to be a preference for autosomal genes (~ 4%) or sex-linked genes (~ 5%). After applying our expression fold change threshold and FDR cutoff to a previously published dataset derived from a Kdm6a KO in a male mouse ES line derived from an independent BC cross, we found good concordance with our results for 40% of downregulated and 31% of upregulated DEGs (Additional file 9: Table S9B) [12].
In the CB cross, we identified 334 downregulated and 213 upregulated DEGs in the three male KO Kdm6a Δ/Y clones compared to two wt clones ( Fig. 1C; Additional file 9: Table S9C). Again, there did not appear to be a preference for autosomal genes (~ 4%) or sex-linked genes (~ 4%). Surprisingly, the lists of DEGs differed between the CB and BC KO clones, with only 1% downregulated and 6% upregulated DEGs in common (Additional file 2: Fig. S2G and Additional file 9: Table S9A, C). Indeed, of the eight known KDM6A targets confirmed in the BC cross, only Bcar3 and Hsd17b11 were called as DEGs in the CB cross. This low degree of overlap was also observed when published data from a KO line from an independent BC cross was compared to the CB KO clones (11% downregulated and 8% upregulated DEGs) [12]. The discrepancy in DEGs may be due to parental strain differences. The low concordance between the CB and BC KO clones prompted us to use a less stringent approach and simply compare the lists of genes with a ≥ 1.25 fold change in TPM value between male KO and wt clones. Using this approach we identified 345 downregulated and 226 upregulated genes shared between the reciprocal crosses ( Fig. 1D; Additional file 9: Table S9D, E). These genes include six known KDM6A targets including Wt1, Bcar3, Foxh1, Dnmt3a, Sox3, and Hsd17b11.
GO terms for downregulated genes common to BC and CB KO clones (≥ 1.25 TPM fold change) are enriched in cardiac ventricle development (e.g. Foxh1 and Adamts6), consistent with heart malformations observed in utero in Kdm6a KO mice (Fig. 1E) [21,43]. Interestingly, the GO terms bone development (e.g. Has2) and hard palate development (e.g. Cbfb) are also highlighted, consistent with high-arched palate and other distinctive bone and facial features observed in Kabuki type 2 syndrome caused by KDM6A mutations in human (Fig. 1D, E) [45][46][47][48]. There is also decreased expression of Nes, a KDM6A target gene identified in neural crest cells that contribute to patterning and formation of all anterior facial bone and cartilage (Additional file 9: Table S9D) [10]. Some of the downregulated genes in KO clones are associated with regulation of T-cell activation (e.g. Ephb6) and neuron projection development (e.g. Tnik), consistent with autoimmune disorders and neurological issues in Kabuki syndrome (Fig. 1E, F) [48]. Upregulated DEGs in BC and CB KO clones include a subset of genes known to be repressed by KDM6A (e.g. Fam114a1, H1f0, Naglu) (Additional file 9: Table S9E) [13]. Note, we did not observe increased expression of Kdm6a's Y-linked paralogue, Uty, in any of the Kdm6a KO clones.
Taken together, our findings support a role for KDM6A in the regulation of a subset of key developmentally critical genes in both male and female mouse ES cells. Despite cell line and clonal variability, downregulated DEGs affirm the role of KDM6A as an enhancer of gene expression, whereas upregulated DEGs indicate a repressive function, which may reflect indirect effects on gene expression. Interestingly, some of the dysregulated genes common to the reciprocal crosses are candidates for a role in clinical features of Kabuki type 2 syndrome in human.

KDM6A facilitates sex-biased autosomal gene expression in mouse ES cells
Next, we investigated the role of KDM6A in regulating sex-biased autosomal gene expression. By comparing wt female and male BC ES cells we identified a 2.4 fold greater number of female-biased (2048) versus malebiased genes (868) (≥ twofold TPM difference cut off; p < 0.05) ( Fig. 2A; Table 1; Additional file: Fig. S3A and Additional file 10: Table S10A). Interestingly, there was a marked loss of sex-biased expression in BC Kdm6a Δ/Y cells (< twofold TPM difference between female wt and Kdm6a Δ/Y ), which amounted to 35% of female-biased genes and 25% of male-biased genes ( Fig. 2; Additional file 3: Fig. S3B and Additional file 10: Table S10B). To confirm these results we re-analyzed a published dataset of expression in BC wt cells and found concordance with our data for 767 sex-biased genes (Additional file 10: Table S10C) [34]. Thirty-two percent of these concordant genes showed loss of sex-biased expression following Kdm6a KO, which again affected more female-biased genes than male biased (Additional file 10: Table S10D). GO analysis of genes that lost female-biased expression following KO revealed several biological processes involved in lipid metabolism consistent with the role of KDM6A in adipocytes and metabolic functions  Genes were determined to be sex-biased in wt cells based on a ≥ twofold TPM difference cut off. Wt lists the number of female-and male-biased genes in BC and CB clones. Loss and Gain indicate the number and percentage of female-and male-biased genes that were lost or gained in KO clones. For CB cells, changes in sex-biased genes were determined by comparing values from CB Kdm6a KO cells to wt values from published data following quantile normalization (see Methods) [34]. See also Fig. 2 (Fig. 2B) [49]. Biological processes for genes with loss of male-biased expression include bone morphogenesis, again consistent with facial features observed in Kabuki type 2 syndrome (Fig. 2B). We also observed some new sex-biased expression after Kdm6a KO, but at a much reduced level, with only 5% genes gaining female-biased expression and 3% genes, male-biased expression (Additional file 3: Fig. S3C, D; Table 1). In the CB cross loss of sex-biased expression after Kdm6a KO was examined using published data for CB male and female ES lines (Table 1; Additional file 3: Fig.  S3E and Additional file 10: Fig. S10E) [34]. We found fewer sex-biased genes in wt CB cells and there was a lesser effect of Kdm6a KO on sex-biased gene expression in CB versus BC clones. Nonetheless, Kdm6a KO in CB cells again caused a greater decrease in female-(32%) than male-biased (24%) genes (Table 1; Additional file 3: Fig. S3F and Additional file 10: Fig. S10E). There was little overlap between genes that lost sex-biased expression in BC and CB clones, suggesting strain or clonal effects.
Taken together, these results suggest that KDM6A, either directly or indirectly, plays a regulatory role in perpetuating autosomal sex-biased expression in ES cells with an emphasis on maintenance of sex-biased, especially female-biased gene expression.

The majority of gene expression changes in Kdm6a KO ES cells are allele-specific
To measure allelic gene expression, we assigned RNAseq reads to parental alleles using SNPs between B6 and cast in the hybrid F1 mouse ES cells from the reciprocal BC and CB crosses. Most genes (94%) had informative SNPs allowing them to be classified as having either biallelic expression or parent-of-origin expression bias (see Methods). Allele-specific differential gene expression changes between Kdm6a KO and wt clones were identified using DESeq2 with the same parameters as described above (≥ 1.5 TPM fold change, FDR < 0.05). Overall, scatter plots of differential maternal and paternal expression were similar to those generated using diploid data (Additional file 4: Fig. S4A, B). However, the number of DEGs detected by allelic analysis may differ from those found by diploid analysis (see Methods).
Surprisingly, a majority of downregulated and upregulated DEGs displayed changes limited to one allele. In the BC cross, allelic expression analysis of Kdm6a Δ/Y clones versus wt showed 167/194 (86%) downregulated and 139/189 (74%) upregulated DEGs with allele-specific changes ( Table 2). Such changes were equally frequent in Kdm6a Δ/Y clones from the CB cross and affected 237/269 (88%) downregulated and 171/198 (86%) upregulated genes (Table 2). However, similar to the diploid analysis above, there was little overlap between allelic DEGs in CB and BC crosses ( Table 2; Additional file 11: Table S11). Downregulated DEGs in KO clones were categorized into three groups: group A includes genes downregulated on the maternal allele, group B, on the paternal allele, and group C, on both alleles (Fig. 3A, C; Table 2). Upregulated DEGs in KO clones were categorized into three groups: group D includes genes upregulated on the maternal allele, group E, on the paternal allele, and group F, on both alleles (Fig. 3B, D; Table 2).
Remarkably, group A genes show a preferential downregulation of maternal alleles in both the BC and CB crosses. Considering the BC cross, group A comprises 109 genes, whereas group B consists of only of 58 genes ( Fig. 3A; Table 2; Additional file 11: Table S11). When only considering clones with exonic Kdm6a deletion (Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 ) overlapping genes continue to show preferential downregulation of maternal alleles (38 for group A versus 20 for group B). Further, comparisons between individual BC KO clones show highly similar expression changes for all allelicly regulated groups (Additional file 4: Fig. S4C). In CB KO clones, there were again more group A (133) than group B genes (104). Similar to BC cells, comparisons between individual CB KO clones show highly similar expression changes for all allelicly regulated groups (Additional file 4: Fig. S4D). Despite differences between BC and CB crosses in A and B genes identified as allelic DEGs, additional analyses of changes in TPM values reveal that 33% of group A and 50% of group B genes identified in male BC clones showed a trend of decreased expression in male CB clones ( Fig. 3C; Table 2; Additional file 11: Table S11 and Additional file 12: Table S12). Among downregulated genes in BC clones we found a subset of maternally (but not paternally) expressed imprinted genes that include the Meg3 cluster, Xlr cluster, and Phlda2 (Additional file 5: Fig. S5A-E and Additional file 11: Table S11A). Another maternally expressed imprinted gene H19 that regulates Igf2 showed a significant decrease in clones Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 (p = 0.01) and a trend for a decrease in clone Kdm6a ΔP4 , as well as a corresponding increase at Igf2 (Additional file 5: Fig. S5F, G). Changes in maternally expressed imprinted genes were not verified in the CB cross where there were few changes in imprinted gene expression, suggesting clonal or parental strain effects (Additional file 5: Fig. S5H). Further comparisons between BC and CB crosses were made to address allelic expression bias of group A and B genes in wt cells. We defined allelic bias as ≥ twofold difference between alleles. We found that a majority of group A genes (maternally downregulated genes) identified in male BC clones (65%) and CB clones (57%) exhibited maternally biased expression in wt clones (Fig. 3A, C; Additional file 5: Fig. S5I, J). This maternal allele biased expression of group A genes in wt cells was also reported in an independently derived CB ES cell line [50]. Group B genes (paternally downregulated) showed a lower percentage of paternally biased expression in wt (BC-36%, CB-15%). Similar to our observations using diploid analyses, there was little overlap in the identity of genes with allelic expression biases in BC and CB wt cells, suggesting parental strain effects (Additional file 5: Fig. S5I, J). In contrast to downregulated genes, upregulated genes did not display an allelic bias, as reflected by a similar number of genes in groups D (68) and E (71) in the male BC clones, but did display a maternal allele bias when comparing groups D (109) and E (69) in the male CB clones (Fig. 3B, D; Table 2; Additional file 11: Table S11G, H).
We conclude that KDM6A preferentially facilitates expression of maternal alleles of a subset of mouse genes.  Table 2 and Additional file 11: Table S11. Group A includes genes downregulated on the maternal allele, group B, on the paternal allele, and group C, on both alleles. Group D includes genes upregulated on the maternal allele, group E, on the paternal allele, and group F, on both alleles While this preference is seen in Kdm6a KO cells from both BC and CB crosses, the lack of overlap between the lists of genes affected in the two crosses suggests that KDM6A regulation of maternal alleles is not genespecific. Interestingly, a majority of these genes exhibit maternal allele-biased expression in wt ES cells, suggesting that differential Kdm6a expression in male and female germ cells may influence parental allele expression.

Epigenetic changes induced by Kdm6a KO
Epigenetic changes and chromatin accessibility were examined at promoter regions (± 2 kb from the TSS) of genes with expression changes after Kdm6a KO, using H3K27me3 ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq to compare male BC Kdm6a ΔE1 and CB Kdm6a ΔE2.5 clones with their respective wt controls. As an initial control, we verified the expected higher H3K27me3 level at the downregulated Hoxb cluster in Kdm6a KO clones (Fig. 4A) [4,10,22]. Consistent with diploid gene expression changes in BC and CB clones, non-allelic analyses show most promoters of downregulated genes present with increased levels of H3K27me3 and decreased chromatin accessibility, while promoters of upregulated genes show decreased H3K27me3 and increased chromatin accessibility (Fig. 4B-D). To rule out indirect effects we verified that expression levels of genes encoding PRC2 complex-associated proteins that mediate H3K27 methylation (Ezh1/2, Suz12, Eed, and Rbbp7) were unchanged in KO clones (Additional file 6: Fig. S6A). Similarly, expression levels of genes (Ep300, Smarca4, Eomes) encoding chromatin remodeling proteins known to mediate H3K27 acetylation by association with KDM6A in the MLL complex were unchanged (Additional file 6: Fig. S6A). However, this analysis does not exclude changes in recruitment of these proteins.
Next, we performed allele-specific ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq to detect H3K27me3 and chromatin accessibility changes on each parental allele. In BC KO cells a significant increase in H3K27me3 at the promoters of maternally downregulated genes (group A) was accompanied by a significant decrease in chromatin accessibility, while maternally upregulated group D and E genes showed the expected increase in chromatin accessibility ( Fig. 5A-C; Additional file 7: Fig. S7A and Additional file 13: Table S13). In contrast, paternally downregulated alleles (group B) showed an increase in H3K27me3 but no significant decrease in chromatin accessibility, while paternally upregulated (group E) genes showed the expected increase in chromatin accessibility (Fig. 5D-F; Additional file 7: Fig. S7A and Additional file 13: Table S13). Importantly, in clones with exonic Kdm6a deletion (Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE3 ), promoters of overlapping genes show similar changes in H3K27me3 and chromatin accessibility (Figs. 3A, B; Additional file 7: Fig. S7B, D, F, H). In the CB cross similar findings for H3K27me3 were obtained for group A genes, while upregulated groups D and E genes showed only a modest increase in chromatin accessibility (Fig. 5G, H; Additional file 13: Table S13). Of note, differences in chromatin accessibility were only observed at promoters of KDM6A target genes, and there were no overall differences in accessibility at other promoters or enhancers (Additional file 6: Fig. S6B, C). Additionally, H3K27me3 showed no overall differences at enhancers regardless of parental allele (Additional file 6: Fig. S6).
Taken together our results show the expected changes in H3K27me3 and chromatin accessibility at upregulated and downregulated DEGs. Allelic analysis demonstrates parental allele-specific changes, notably for downregulated group A genes, which display a consistent increase in H3K27me3 on both parental alleles in both crosses. However, chromatin accessibility changes were partly inconsistent with changes in H3K27me3 in BC and CB KO clones, a phenomenon observed in other studies [10,51,52].

Discussion
Here, we show that Kdm6a KO in ES cells derived from reciprocal crosses between C57BL/6 J and Mus castaneus results in significant dysregulation of genes involved in development and reproduction. Depletion of KDM6A leads to a loss in sex-biased gene expression, particularly female-biased expression, suggesting a new role for the histone demethylase. We also found a strong downregulation of maternal alleles in Kdm6a KO clones from both reciprocal crosses. Furthermore, a large subset of the target genes exhibits maternal allele expression bias in wt ES cells from both crosses. The higher expression of Kdm6a in females versus males due to escape from X inactivation may explain the preferential regulation of maternal allele expression.
Gene regulation by KDM6A mainly depends on its catalytic function. Indeed, depletion or inhibition of KDM6A results in decreased gene expression due to higher levels of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3 at promoters and/or enhancers of target genes, which readily explains our findings of H3K27me3 enrichment and downregulation of genes after Kdm6a KO [14,42,53]. Conversely, higher KDM6A expression in human cancer causes a decrease of H3K27me3 enriched heterochromatin [54]. Aside from its catalytic function, KDM6A can also enhance gene expression through other mechanisms that involve recruitment of the MLL complex to increase histone acetylation [10][11][12]. Finally, KDM6A may act as a repressor of gene expression, underscoring the complexity of this protein [10,11,13,55]. Indirect effects are also expected, which could explain some of our findings of upregulated genes after Kdm6a KO. In particular, the more than twofold reduction in Dnmt3a expression in KO male BC clones could cause DNA hypomethylation and upregulation of DNMT3A target genes, such as Celsr1 and Fah [56]. Similarly, the decrease in Tet1 expression in KO female ES cells could explain increased expression of TET1 target genes such as Casp8.
A number of KO dysregulated genes were found to differ between crosses, which could be due to differences between the wt ES cell lines and/or to strain differences. Clonal variability is a limitation of the study, which we addressed by using both a stringent DESeq2 approach and a less stringent fold change approach to identify gene expression changes in BC and CB KO cells. Importantly, among the KDM6A targets common to both reciprocal crosses we identified a subset of genes associated with multiple phenotypes observed in individuals with Kabuki syndrome due to mutations in KDM6A in human. For example, Has2 and Cbfb have been implicated in hard palate development, malformations of which are often  [48,57,58]. Ephb6 and Tnik were also downregulated in Kdm6a KO cells derived from reciprocal crosses consistent with immunopathological phenotypes and neurological disorders seen in the syndrome [48]. Our identification of KO dysregulated genes involved in development, immune cell functions, neuronal cell functions, and metabolism may help further identify KDM6A targets implicated in Kabuki syndrome,  in (A, B) but in the CB Kdm6a ΔE2.5 clone. Only maternally downregulated genes (group A) show increased H3K27me3. There were no significant ATAC-seq changes. H Same analysis as in (D, E) but in the CB Kdm6a ΔE2.5 clone. Maternally downregulated group A show increased H3K27me3, while ATAC-seq changes were only seen on paternal alleles. Group A includes genes downregulated on the maternal allele and group B on the paternal allele. Group D includes genes upregulated on the maternal allele and group E, on the paternal allele a disorder with more severe phenotypes in males [48,59,60].
We report on a new role for KDM6A, which is to maintain sex-biased, especially female-biased gene expression. KDM6A appears to maintain female-biased expression via repression of genes in males, which is surprising since KDM6A's main function is to facilitate gene expression through removal of H3K27me3. However, this may be due to indirect effects of KDM6A depletion as mentioned above. Indeed, there appears to be little commonality in genes that gain sex bias following KO.
A surprising finding from our allelic expression analyses is that a majority of gene dysregulation after Kdm6a KO occurs on one allele or the other, with a strong maternal allele bias. This novel observation was made in both reciprocal crosses, even though the sets of dysregulated alleles differ. Female-biased expression of Kdm6a due to escape from X inactivation is consistent with a role in differential regulation of the maternal and paternal genomes [61]. How this allelic regulation is transmitted through generations will need to be further investigated. H3K27me3 is known to play a critical role in the repression of the maternal allele at non-canonical imprinted sites, loss of which leads to loss of imprinting [62]. Thus, manipulating the dosage of Kdm6a in differentiating hybrid primordial germ cells where genomic imprints are established may yield insights into its role in regulating non-canonical imprinted genes. Further, utilizing independent reciprocal crosses with Kdm6a KO will help to identify potential non-canonical imprinted gene targets. Future allelic expression studies using differentiating ES cells following KO would be interesting since KDM6A target genes may also have roles in germ layer development and ES cell differentiation [14,17]. We found changes in H3K27me3 and chromatin accessibility at dysregulated alleles but these were not always concordant with expression changes. This was not entirely unexpected as H3K27me3 levels are not always correlated with expression [10,52]. Furthermore, many of allelicly repressed genes were more highly expressed from downregulated alleles in wt suggesting a higher sensitivity to changes in H3K27me3.

Perspectives and significance
Results from our study provide important findings implicating KDM6A, a female-biased chromatin modifier, in allelic gene regulation with a preference for maternal alleles. These data emphasize that inclusion of allelic analyses of gene regulation will enhance our understanding of parent-of-origin effects and sex-specific differences. Our study also provides evidence of a role of KDM6A in the regulation of sex-biased gene expression, which could have broad implications in understanding sex differences. Our CRISPR deletions encompass known pathogenic mutations seen in Kabuki syndrome, including loss of exons 1-2 [63]. Thus, results from this study may reveal therapeutic targets for individuals with Kabuki syndrome.
Considering KDM6A's role in embryonic development, it will be of interest to determine whether sex-biased and parental allele effects of depletion persist during differentiation. Kdm6a KO mice have a sex-specific phenotype, with male mice runt but able to survive, while female mice die during embryogenesis [21]. This has been attributed to a demethylase-independent mechanism of compensation by UTY, which has little or no demethylase activity [21]. A number of escape genes have a Y-linked paralogues that may have synergistic roles in gene regulation. Therefore, it will be important to fully tease out the possible compensatory role of Uty on gene expression by generating ES cell clones with Kdm6a and Uty specific KO. Future analyses considering additional epigenetic marks such as H3K4me3, H3K9ac and DNA methylation will help to ascertain the complex network of gene regulation by KDM6A. Finally, extending our studies of KDM6A's role in gene regulation to human cells will help determine whether KDM6A's functions are conserved between mice and humans at target genes and regulatory elements.

Conclusions
Here, we demonstrate for the first time a role in the regulation of sex-biased genes and a maternal allele bias in gene regulation by a gene that escapes X inactivation, a uniquely female phenomenon. Our results implicate KDM6A as a master regulator of fetal growth and development through the control of a subset of maternally biased genes. While our studies are performed in ES cells where developmental pathways are not fully represented, our data provide information on pathways and lineages that may be impacted in syndromes due to KDM6A mutations such as Kabuki Syndrome.
Additional file 1: Fig. S1. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of Kdm6a in BC and CB mouse ES cells. (A) Schematic shows location of the exonic deletion (Kdm6a ΔE ) that removed exons 2-4 of Kdm6a in male BC and CB ES cells. Exons are shown as vertical bars with location of the PCR and RT-PCR primers (color-coded arrows) used to confirm the deletion and measure expression. Above, images of gels after electrophoresis of PCR products (gDNA), RT-PCR products (cDNA), and Western blot (protein) confirm KDM6A KO in male BC clones (Kdm6a ΔE1 , Kdm6a ΔE3 ) and CB clones (Kdm6a ΔE2.5 , Kdm6a ΔE2.7 ) compared to wt (color-coding refers to primers shown on schematic). Actb was run as a control for PCR and RT-PCR and Ponceau S staining was used as loading control for the Western blot. Sanger sequencing shown below the schematic was done to verify deletions in all male Kdm6a ΔE clones compared to wt. (B) Schematic shows location of the promoter region deletion (Kdm6a ΔP ) made in male BC and CB ES cells. Exons are shown as vertical bars with location of the PCR and RT-PCR primers (color-coded arrows) used to confirm the deletion and measure expression. Above, images of gels after electrophoresis of PCR products (gDNA) and RT-PCR products (cDNA) confirm KDM6A KO in male BC clone (Kdm6a ΔP4 ) and CB clone (Kdm6a ΔP2.1 ) compared to wt. Actb was run as a control for PCR and RT-PCR. Sanger sequencing shown below the schematic was done to verify deletions in all Kdm6a ΔP male BC and CB clones. (C-D) UCSC genome browser (GRCm38/mm10) view of RNA-seq profiles for (C) BC male and female wt, BC male clones Kdm6a ΔE and Kdm6a ΔP , and (D) CB male wt, and CB male Kdm6a ΔE and Kdm6a ΔP clones. Note that a low level of 3' end reads are present in clones with deletion of exons 2-4, although there is no evidence of protein (see A above). In clones with deletion of the promoter, there are no reads over Kdm6a, including no reads overlapping the small alternative Kdm6a transcript, confirming absence of expression and suggesting the absence of a cryptic promoter for the smaller annotated transcript. Actb was used as a PCR control.  1 ). DESeq2 was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each cross using an FDR cutoff of < 0.05 and a ≥ 1.5 fold-change.
Additional file 3: Fig. S3. Changes in sex-biased gene expression in Kdm6a KO BC and CB clones. (A) Scatter plots of log 2 gene expression between male and female lines illustrating the degree of sex-biased expression in wt cells. Sex-biased genes were identified by comparing two BC male wt clones versus two BC female male wt clones. A gene was classified as sex-biased if its expression is ≥ 2 TPM fold expression higher in either female wt or male wt cells (p ≤ 0.05). Female-biased genes are in light orange and male-biased genes in light blue. (B) Scatter plot showing loss of sex-biased expression in three BC male Kdm6a Δ/Y clones (Kdm6a ΔE1 , Kdm6a ΔE3 , and Kdm6a ΔP4 ) versus two BC female wt clones. Genes that lost sex-biased expression in KO cells are in dark orange if female-biased in wt, and in dark blue if male-biased in wt. (C) Scatter plot of genes without sex-biased expression (< 2 TPM fold expression difference) in wt BC cells. (D) Gain of sex biased expression in in three BC male Kdm6a Δ/Y clones (Kdm6a ΔE1 , Kdm6a ΔE3 , and Kdm6a ΔP4 ). (E, F). Scatter plots of log 2 gene expression of sex-biased genes in (E) three CB male wt clones versus three CB female wt clones, (F) three CB male Kdm6a Δ/Y (Kdm6a ΔE2.5 , Kdm6a ΔE2.7 , and Kdm6a ΔP2.1 ) clones versus three CB female wt clones. Same analysis as in A, B. All wt expression values are from re-analysis of published RNA-seq data in CB ES cells, as we did not have access to a female wt CB line [34]. See also Table 1 and Additional file 10: Table S10. Expression fold changes between Kdm6a Δ/Y clones (Kdm6a ΔE1 , Kdm6a ΔE3 , and Kdm6a ΔP4 ) and wt measured by RNA-seq for genes encoding known chromatin modifying proteins in the PRC2 complex (Ezh1/2, Suz12, Eed, Rbbp7) and the MLL complex (Ep300, Smarca4, Eomes). (B) Box plots of allelic ATAC-seq read coverage at gene enhancers in male BC and CB clones (Kdm6a ΔE1 and Kdm6a ΔE2.5 ) compared to their respective wt controls. Enhancers (n = 25,346) were defined as regions enriched in H3K4me3 and H3K27ac in male ES cells as described [12]. (C) Same analysis as in (B) but for promoters (n = 20,745). ATAC-seq coverage was calculated using ± 2 kb surrounding the transcription start sites determined